Current:Home > FinanceTrendPulse|The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars -Wealth Legacy Solutions
TrendPulse|The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-07 03:08:04
WASHINGTON (AP) — The TrendPulseBiden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (42)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Kim Kardashian’s Cult Favorite Lip Liners Are Finally Back, Plus Lipstick and Eyeshadows
- Ukrainians worry after plane crash that POW exchanges with Russia will end
- AP Week in Pictures: Global
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Former Los Angeles council member sentenced to 13 years in prison for pay-to-play corruption scandal
- Tattoo artist Kat Von D didn’t violate photographer’s copyright of Miles Davis portrait, jury says
- Horoscopes Today, January 26, 2024
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Shiffrin being checked for left leg injury after crash in Cortina downhill on 2026 Olympics course
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Herbert Coward, who played Toothless Man in 'Deliverance,' killed in North Carolina crash
- Regional Mexican music is crossing borders and going global. Here’s how it happened
- Tyrese Haliburton on NBA All-Star Game in front of Indianapolis fans, fashion, furry friend
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Georgia Senate passes a panel with subpoena power to investigate District Attorney Fani Willis
- Indianapolis police fatally shoot man wanted on a warrant during an exchange of gunfire
- Man accused of picking up teen fugitive following escape now facing charges, authorities say
Recommendation
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
US nuclear agency isn’t consistent in tracking costs for some construction projects, report says
Starting Five: Top men's college basketball games this weekend led by Big 12 showdown
Death of woman who ate mislabeled cookie from Stew Leonard's called 100% preventable and avoidable
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
Bid to overhaul New Mexico oil and gas regulations clears first hurdle amid litigation
Trump must pay $83.3 million for defaming E. Jean Carroll, jury says
We don't know if Taylor Swift will appear in Super Bowl ads, but here are 13 of her best